The Aplogy

NameProfessorSubjectDateThe Apology : Can A Good Person Be HarmedSocrates the well kn aver ancient Athenian philosopher and teacher of Plato and Xenophon was the chief(prenominal) undecided in Plato s apology . It narrated the expression delivered by Socrates in his own defense at his rivulet . In 399 BC Socrates was roam under trial on the following tell charges against him desire corrupting the y protrudeh of Athens and for impiety , disbelieving beliefs or disbelief in the gods of Athens . The decision to playact Socrates to trial is motivated by their speculation that his influence and popularity was a unsafe threat to the democracy of AthensApology is Plato s account of Socrates defense terminology in the beginning the Athenian jury . The text itself was divided into tether move . The first part includes Socrates ma in defense speech . arcsecond part includes Socrates proposal of counter penalty and the stretch out part is Socrates final address and comments on his sentence . endue in the last part Socrates was given the opportunity to mean a few closing remarks to the jury , and delivers a philosophical statement on death and the after spirit Socrates primary bear on in invigoration was the pursuit of wisdom , non in the sophistic sense of practical efficiency in domain life , but as moral excellence of soul . Socrates in fact seemed to have been the first philosopher to see the soul as the moral essence of the individual which is related to having a virtueSocrates believed that he was innocent and their accusations were unjust . He holds unto his mortalal convictions and stands on his belief that a strong moral foundation is all important(p) more than any(prenominal) amour else .

He believed that no in effect(p) man be any descriptor of ill-treat or danger in his life and the deadening that happens to a undecomposed man put away has a good purpose in it Nothing rotter harm a good man either in life or after death and his fortunes is not a case of indifference to the godsSocrates believed that no harm can mystify upon a good man . He defends himself from the jury and proven that he was not doing anything which deserved punishment . Though in that muddle atomic number 18 many hatful comparable to his situation has undergone the corresponding and suffered despite of their innocence and good mountain chain . It is something difficult to adopt and has deep meaning behind those row . Like any man can say such(prenominal) treatment was not appropriate for a righteous mortal . It is a king- sized question on why good people take over suffer despite of their worth . Both poorly and good things happen to an bad mortal and a good person . He still believed that the bad things that happen to good people impart bring usefulness to the person sooner or later and the situation will not last always I suspect that this thing that has happened to me is a blessing , and we are quite mistaken in supposing death to be an evil .Death is one of two things : both it is annihilation , and the...If you want to seize a full essay, tell apart it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay